Stunt Politics No Answer

Scan page 6

the centre of debate.

Over the past few weeks the centrist and reformist organisations of the British left have spent some time providing the working class with examples of how not to fight The revolutionary movement has always stood out firmly for the demand 'No Platform for Fascists' This summarises the necessity to stop, by any means needed (including the use of violence), the mobilisation and growth of the fascist organisations.

DIFFERENT

These groups are very different from the traditional conservative parties of the capitalist class, which carry out the 'dictatorship of the bourgeoisie' within the parliamentary framework in periods of relative social stability.

The fascists, by contrast, otfer a road of action and mass organisation to the layers of society which are least well organised and least able to defend themselves against the attacks of the bourgeoisie-the middle class and unemployed workers-especially the frustrated youth.

Feeding off the effecis of the capitalist crisis - mass unemployment, poor housing, slashed social services, plunging living 'standards -and revelling in the betrayals of the Labour and trade union leaders who prevent the working class mobilising in action to end these conditions, the fascists act as last-ditch defenders of the capitalist system.

Their function is to divert the frustration and anger of the working class away from its proper target, and to fashion from the most confused layers of society a weapon to attack the organised labour movement itself.

They turn the anger and desperation of these people onto the immigrant and black population, exploiting the chauvinist legacy of Britain's imperialist history, and increasingly they direct against the left and the labour movement in an attempt to make the 'Reds' scapegoats for the social crisis of the capitalist system.

'ACTION'

In neither case is their campaign est..123 to abuse or argument' ..lms raast pogroms, a chance :: sr da something 4: șeşen: fascism is a marginal 13:5= Bruish polities. But even art they are the instigators of extensive scale.

Recent months have seen left bookshops and black community centres in London firebombed, and £10,000 worth of arson damage to the headquarters of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP).

Every day the fascists feel strong enough to engage in individual provocations, harassment of blacks, and the colonisation of pubs as fascist preserves.

They continually attempt to organise demonstrations in black areas so as to rub in the message that the 'whites' will stay on top.

But this remains a tactic towards their main objective-the destruction of the organisations of the working class. We do not grant fascists the right to deepen this campaign. We challenge the bourgeois courts and police when they insist that fascism must be defended.

HITLER

are sufficiently strong in if we to the fascists then antirelation should follow Trotsky's fascists advice: "The tactical, or if you will, 'technical' task was quite simple-grab every fascist or every isolated group of fascists by their collars, acquaint them with the pavement a few times, strip them of their fascist insignia and documents, and without carrying things any further, leave them with their fright and a few good black and blue marks."

We listen very carefully to someone who should know how to destroy fascism - Adolph Hitler.

His opinion should be the starting point of the fight against the National Front scum:

"Only one thing would have stopped our movement-if our adversaries had understood its principles and from the first day had smashed with the utmost brutality the nucleus of our new movement."

This understanding is, however, only the starting point. As recent have demonstrated, the actions of the SWP and IMG, and evente (from a different standpoint) the Communist Party and Mintant group, have served to block the mobilisation of the mass organisations of the working class to carry out the destruction of the Front and their allies.

The Communist Party, put onto the defensive by its miserable 4:l.-s inin the SHP demonsstration in Lewisham, had the hypocrisy to praise the thousands of militant demonstrators for their 'courage and determination' which (from the CP's view on the sidelines) was apparently 'particularly impressive' (Morning Star, August 26).

And in an attempt to bolster its anti-fascist reputation the CP has printed a eulogy by James Klugmann of the CP's role in the 1936 Cable Street mobilisation (see the last issue of Socialist Press for an exposure of their waver ings before this demonstration).

None of this, nor vague tal: of 'necessary confrontation with the NF" will disguise the simple tact that the whole direction of the CP's campaigns have been to ask the bourgeois state to ban the fascists while the CP has consciously sabotaged militant anti-fascist activities.

On August 13 in Lewisham, helped by their hangers-on in the Militant grouping, the CP built and supported their local version of the Popular Front, the All Lewisham Committee Against Racism and Fascism (ALCARAF).

They marched with the foca: prepared to demonstratior Did they organisation who could fascists in the Anglican church hierarchy to implore the Home Secretary to ban provocative fascist demonstrations -and to implore trade unionists who were there not to join the SWP's demonstration that afternoon. Their excuse? A claimed lack of mass mobilisation, the absence of the labour movement. But did these toadies of the labour bureaucracy try to mobilise the masses?

Did they say openly that if the forces are favourable that they were Honmler and Hitler. smash this fascist take seriously the of defence squads have dealt with the right circumstances?

RESPECTABILITY mantein heir respecters.:

workers movement iron.

danger of fascism, to cling to the hope that a beneficient bourgeoisie will help them out of their dilemma with a ban on the National Front's activities. Memcers and suppors or ite ce trist SWP and the "Trotskyists" of the IMG have obviously fought hard and courageously at these demonstrations.

But both of these organisations and in particular the SWP have avoided the struggle to mobilise the widest possible united action of the organised working class against the fascist thugs, and have consistently separated the mobilisation of antifascists from the overall struggle against the reformist bureaucrats.

They too have repeatedly slipped into legalism and opportunism (more pronounced in the case of the IMG whose "unity' campaign brings them closer and closer to the democrats' of the middle cla*? and Stalinists of the Communist Party).

ADVENTURES

But at the same cime they have lapsed into secarian adventures and attempts to substitute themselves for the working class (more obvious with the SWP, whose insatiable desire for publicity only matches its empty arrogance in declaring itself 'the revolutionary party').

Starting off from the halfexpressed feeling that fascism is a special, extraordinary threat, these organisations feel a need to employ "special' and, they hope' instantly effective methods, rather thar make the fight against fascism :

part of a consistent battle fo leadership in the working class.

It is of course difficult and slov to raise the question of seriou anti-fascist activity in the trad unions and to expose the Labou Party on this subiect.

their haste centrists ignor this vital work and turn to the stat with pleas for bans or to the limite forces that they themselves ca immediatcly bring out onto th SUICIDAL The turn to the bourgeois sta is a suicidal breach of Marxi principles that belongs to reformis and not to a revolutionary orga isation.

Let us compare the SWP IMG with the reformists 5: Lists on this question.

TiE Labour Council

Lewisham had only one programı in the fight against fascism-y Home Secretar: Ear. Mis mai and stop the vaerce.

The Communa: Party ore Sa s: Augus: 26 5t1:

Scan page 7

SOCIALIST PRESS. Wedn

the wish:

... to secure a complete and effective ban on all racist activity for t prop events to be ban capaign The IMG in the Socialist Challenge Special Issue on Lewisham and Ladywood: marches.» a ban on the fascist "We too are in favour of marches.

Kim Gordon, SWP candidate at the Ladywood by-election:

"We don't want any riots. What we do want is to register our protest in front of the press. We are going to ask the police to get the National Front to stop their meeting."

{Quoted in The Guardian, August 16).

In Leamington the SWP have demonstrated under the central slogan of 'Prosecute the Racists' after four men were charged with criminal damage for painting out fascist slogans.

Trotsky's opinion of was very clear:

"To turn to the state, that is, to capital, with the demand to disarm the fascists means to sow the worst democratic illusions, to lull the demoralise its will." Proletariat, to 'War and the Fourth International', Writings, 1933-4.

These demands can hardly coexist with a serious attitude to the mobilisation of the working class against the fascists.

ILLUSIONS

To take this position, to say that the blocking of the fascists is the "job of the police' makes it more and more difficult to argue for anything other than demonstations and activity whose aim is to pressure the police into acting on behalf of the working class.

To point out the fundamental nature of the state, to educate workers in reliance on their own organised strength is a task that conflicts sharply with any suggestion that this or that action of the state is accidental, a product of the wrong policemen being in control.

Besides encouraging illusions in the neutrality and democratic nature of the capitalist state machine the position of demanding bans on the fascists and prosecutions for racial hatred has the immediate and practical effect of encouraging the climate of public opinion that is favourable to state control of and interference into the activities of 'political extremists' SOPHISTICATED The lists of anti-fascists arrested at each demonstration prove conclusively that the state would use any powers of banning to repress the left and the labour movement.

The Public Order Act of 1936 was introduced ostensibly to stop the fascists. Its provisions have only ever been used against the left and the IRA.

The most sophisticated excuse for this reformist desire to 'pressure' the state is the SWP's argument that this will 'expose' the nature of the state.

For our part we would rather not have that proved by having one of our demonstrations banned or by seeing a left wing organisation proscribed. eptember 1977 Is the of the stare at action Grunwicks or Lewisham not sufficient exposure? The bourgeoisie is quite capable of launching sharp attacks on democratic rights without the kindly efforts of self-styled revolutionaries' On the other side of the coin is the sectarianism and adventurism shown in the way that the SWP in particular has mobilised for these demonstrations.

As with the IMG in Red Lion Square in 1974 the SWP attempts to substitute the organisation of leftists for the military organisation of the working class.

Our position is entirely different trom that of the Communist Party.

SUBSTITUTE

We are in no way opposed to small (or large) groups of left-wingers teaching the fascists a lesson in conditions where this does not involve a futile confrontation with the police.

But this can be no substitute for a mobilisation of the working class fighting to establish workers defence squads based on the trade unions.

The (then Trotskyist) Socialist Workers Party of America in the 1930s was able to use its trade union base to form big defence guards which chased the fascists out of town on a number of occasions.

Everything has to be diverted to achieving this sort of organisation. Of course this will not come without a political struggle or in a short time on any significant scale.

But the fight for this perspective coupled with full participation in demonstrations and actions aimed at the fascists will prepare the ground for the effective arming and military organisation of the working class.

EXPERIENCES

The Transitional Programme of the Fourth International, drawing on the experiences of the American Trotskyists summarises chis approach:

"Only armed workers detachments, who feel the support of tens of millions of toilers behind them, can successfully prevail fascist bands...

Only with the help of such systematic, persistent indefatigable courageous agitational and organisational work, always on the basis of the experience of the masses themselves, is it possible to root out from their consciousness the traditions of submissiveness and passivity." (p. 18).

The method of the SWP and the IMG (who would like the same mistakes to be repeated by everybody on the left in a united effort)

but the police.

These conflicts generally result in the beating up of numerous militants, and invite repression, in conditions where the left is relatively isolated from the big workers organisations.

Red Lion Square illustrated the dangers of this with great clarity, whilst the identical tactics of the French Pabloites of the LCR led directly to the banning of that organisation after a head-on assault on the heavily armed police guard of a fascist meeting in Paris in 1973.

The origins of this perspective, which results in a series of stalemates between the left and the police, lie in the refusal of the centrists to consistently, and in an all-round fashion, tackle the dominance of reformism and Stalinism in the working class with an alternative, independent political CRISIS This refusal appears in a pointed way in relation to the anti-racist and anti-fascist activity of the centrist groups. For the Workers Socialist League, racism and its organised expression, fascism, are produced by the crisis of capitalism and by the defence of that outworn system by the trade union and Labour leadership.

With no organised and determined fight taking place on a national level against the attacks of capitalism it becomes easy for the fascists to offer a 'solution' which has nothing to do with the destruction of capitalism.

It is the same misleaders who retuse to fight fascism that refuse to fight wage cuts, unemployment Age PHOTO: Andrew Wiard. Report.

Police use riot shields in Lewisham or the oppression of minority groups and women. For us, every struggle of the working class c: oppressed groups has to be turned against the existing leadership and every attempt made to break the working class in action away from that old leadership.

This means that the fight for workers defence against fascism should also be coupled with a fight for an all-round political programme to defend jobs, living standards and social services and to lay down a fundarnental challenge to the established leadership of the working class.

And each mobilisation against the fascists has to be organised as far as possible through a struggle inside the trade unions and the Labour Party, and not by 'outflanking' the existing organisations of the working class.

The way forward in the combatting of the neo-Nazi thugs has to be through the building of a united front of working class organisations on a wide scale, and the formation of workers defence guards as the advance guard of that united front.

April 23 mobilisation against fascists in Harringer

Scan page 8

CATCHING Dixon (Pluto P each) Reviewer THEM YOUNG by Bob ress, 2 Volumes at f 1.80 1 by Richard Bri oks. they feel to be "wrong" but Aurora and her family take it all in

----- pull-quotes -----

tete al the fascists offer "action' promise of organised terror

is to engage in numerous confron- tations with ... not the fascists,

Fi FASCISTS THEY SHALL NOT PASS NG