Workers Socialist League

Socialist Press, Trotskyism Today, Woman Worker, Class Fighter and the Trotskyist International Liaison Committee, 1975–1984

The Notorious

Socialist Press no. 41, 25 August 1976 · scan p. 8 · about 305 words

Read it in the scan (PDF), scan page 8 →

Read from the scan by machine and not corrected: expect misread words, and now and then a caption or a line from a neighbouring story. For anything you quote, read the scan.

Scan page 8

toc pas Edi (aft wa: off: ser anc anc pai spi che sup buI the ticism is a turning point bourgeois philosophy.

He took Locke's empiricism -the view that the senses are the basis of all knowledge - and drove it, with ruthless logic, to more far-reaching conclusions than Locke had ever dared.

EXPERIENCE

He denied there was any reason innate in man, arguing that all our thoughts, and our moral feelings, arise directly or indirectly from experience and are formed through habit.

Up to Hume's time, philosophers had described and mapped the human mind, always discovering in it certain universal elements -*reason', "moral sense' and so on -which were generally used to justify the immortality of the soul.

to the Labour and Trade Union bureaucrats. This element of the Karl Marx Hume, the arch-empiricist, put the "soul' in his philosopher's crucible, analysed it with logic and roasted it with irony, and discovered - that there was nothing permanent or absolute in it at all!

And he went further, to point out that neither logic nor religion could ever give "proofs' for the existence of man's natural world and still less for God's supernatural one.

*To have recourse to the veracity of the Supreme Being, in order to prove the veracity of our senses," Hume sarcastically concluded, "is surely making a very unexpected circuit. If his veracity were at all concerned in the matter, our senses would be entirely infallible; because it is not possible he can ever deceive.

"Not to mention that, if the external world be once called in question, we shall be at a loss to find arguments, by which we may prove the existence of that Being or any of his attributes." (Enquiry Concerning Understanding, para. 120).

Such results greatly upset the clergy. It is easy to understand why

← Contents of Socialist Press no. 41, 25 August 1976

Something wrong on this page? Tell us →