[production; and the second, which Lenin gave to…]

Scan page 4

production; and the second, which Lenin gave to this second 'Imperialism' a mural by Diego Rivera currents within the without changing the fundamenmovement that seek to tals of the capitalist systemThe Zionist movement has always operated by obtaining support from the chief imperialist powers and anyone else available.

Thus in the early period, it convinced the British government that it would be in their strategic interests to set up 'a new Ulster' in the Middle East against the development of Arab liberation movements.

So in August 1917 the This state has never occupied merely the territory set out for it by the United Nations in 1948, but has expanded its frontiers by a series of predatory wars in 1948, 1956 and 1967, carried out in alliance with various sections of imperialism.

The development of militant movement of the dispossessed Palestinians since the 1960s and the setback of the Marx showed how all class societies passed through two stages-the first, in which they were historically progressive and developed humanity's forces of retrogressive, stage when the class relations became a fetter on further development.

"Imperialism' is the term political workers' liberate retrogressive stage of capitalism, which began around 1900.

His book, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, analysed the characteristics of this stage: monopoly. the dominance of money over industrial capital; the growing export of capital by the advanced (imperialist) countries; and the division of the world market among the capitalist monopolies along with the completion of the territorial division of the world Politically Lenin's Imperialism was the theoretical foundation of the Third (Communist)

It showed how the First World War (in which most of the parties of the Second International had supported "their own" bourgeoisie) was the result of the destructive rivalries of the advanced capitalist nations.

Imperialism was, therefore, the age of capitalism's decay; the age in which capitalism had achieved all it was capable of for humanity-it was rotten ripe.

Imperialism to revolutionary Marxists, therefore, is also the age of a new social revolutionthe socialist revolution.

the working class reformism.

The working class, as Marx and Engels said, 'has no country"

It is an international class, the first class in world history capable of creating a society without class or national antagonisms.

Revolutionary Marxism, therefore, is hostile to nationalism in general since it is an obstacle to world socialism.

Lenin' however, pointed out that in its imperialist epoch capitalism "formerly the great liberator of nations had become the great oppressor of nations"

So although the nationalism of the imperialist nations is unambiguously reactionary, the struggle of the oppressed nations for national liberation can play a temporarily revolutionary role.

Marxists always oppose national oppression and support the right of the people of all nations to self-determination.

The objective of proletarian internationalism is the voluntary union of nations in a United Socialist States of the World.

Internationalism is rejected not only by the nationalist bourgeoisie, but also by even 'left' reformism (e.g. the Tribune group's cherished import controls) and by Stalinism in its pursuit of alliances with the bourgeoisie in the capitalist countries and "socialism in one country" in the degenerated workers' states. Fascism-a last resort for imperialism